White Spots On My Dogs Nose

Most of you have finished a season of your life (I speak of my students @ s's degree). You have arrived when you begin to fly solo. I say goodbye to tod @ s, wanting you to be very happy and all that I manage to propongáis in life. You know where to find me.
Next stop:

http://matesymasmates.blogspot.com/

PLAYA DE LOS LOCOS (SUANCES)

Pattern To Make My Own English Saddle Pad

Farewell Selected Resources

1 .- Collection date problems (selectivity): SEE
2 .- selectivity tests (all subjects): SEE 3 .- Information
Selectivity (forums) SEE
4 .- Testing Selectivity Andalucía 2002-2009: SEE

I Have A Tender Cervix

Laredo

It amazes me the number of people visiting this blog, created initially for 70 alumn @ s de 2 º Bach, alumn @ s of a small town of Huelva ( Cartaya ), but I'm particularly happy this morning as a countryman of Cantabria sailor has come to visit. I hope you do not run on a single anecdote. I would also like to thank everyone s visit to which you have gone through the Blog.

I leave a nice link Laredo LAREDO 1

LAREDO2

.

I leave a link that I liked it, thanks Javi. LINK

Earth Wind Fire Songs On Everybody Hates Chris

ISO 26000 And you say you are socially responsible?

Today the issue of social responsibility is as the subject of total quality in the years 80, which do not talk about anything and not in fashion because it did not mention some have commented that the linking of CSR with fashion is that he knows of social responsibility. Increasingly

service companies such as banks, insurance companies, telephone companies, hotels and even private hospitals covered in their Web pages mention the issue of social responsibility and each time I see this I wonder if you know all those that is socially responsible organizations or if they thought that philanthropic activities are socially engaged and responsible.

Understand that being socially responsible means responding to the impacts of their activities and decisions in their stakeholders and it must also be able to report it, deemed to be transparent, ethical behavior, respect the laws, respect international standards of behavior and above all respect the human rights of its stakeholders.

will know that they must have a good government that must respect the environment, to be honest with competence, respect their consumers and contribute to community development.

would be interesting to know the answer.

If you think like users of these services, it would be interesting to survey those companies imaginary based on compliance with simple indicators linked with some key themes and issues of social responsibility as:

The treatment of workers and whether they are aware that this is the most important actor in your organization and as such deserve respect, good treatment, safe working conditions , fair wages, health programs, right to breathe healthy environment, human development and training in the workplace and of course time for family and personal life.

If positive response, I wonder if this is so, why in many of these organizations are staffed by poorly educated, and paid sub as a result of this unmotivated and often angry, This definitely affects the good customer care?.

relationship with the environment, and if they are aware that they must prevent pollution, use resources sustainably, protect the environment and diversity.

If positive response, I wonder why you do not have a policy for handling solid and liquid waste, or recycling and energy saving for example?

relationship with its suppliers and whether they are aware that this relationship is on two tracks, one on the impact they have on the social responsibility of the organization, and one on the influence that the organization should play in these as part of its sphere of influence. Because

answer is positive, I wonder why the organization does not take action in their purchasing decisions when their suppliers abuse the human rights of their workers or pollute the environment?

The customer care and if you really know the degree of satisfaction of their customers or consumers, if given clear information about the service they are going to pay, if they have ever received any complaints from a customer and have resolved these with due diligence and in a timely manner. Because

answer is positive and I wonder why sometimes you see the client as an enemy of the organization or is considered a difficult client? Why are some customers change companies or not return? About the community

ask them if they take into account and do not really conform to planting trees, funding sports teams, and other philanthropic activities.

If I succeed, then I would ask "Why when you do not give hiring preference to members of your community with the profile? Or why not buy from local suppliers? Or simply, what you've invested in society?

A good reflection ... let us think ...


S. Perla Puterman

Stopping Yorkshire Pudding Sticking

Some issues

I found these notes in Mathematics, are good and can be easily downloaded:

NOTES

Cake Designs Motorcycle

What our countries expect the ISO 26000?

Last week 09 and 10 August was held in Lima, Peru, the National Forum (open) on the ISO 26000 Social Responsibility Guide, organized by INDECOPI supported by ISO / DEVCO and AIDS in Sweden.

During the meeting held on Tuesday 10 August, presented a summary of the expectations of the countries of Central America, the Caribbean and South America with respect to the future ISO 26000, based on reports submitted by participating countries.

As occurred in Copenhagen during the month of May, the Forum organized in Peru, returned to bring together leading experts in the Guide to Social Responsibility in Latin America.

The following are what are the expectations of these countries regarding the implementation of ISO 26000 once approved.

• The future ISO 26000 tends to be a powerful tool to help businesses, governments, associations, institutions and NGOs to incorporate social responsibility as a principle of good governance, thus contributing to a more conscious and sustainable natural and human resources
• Developing stronger relationships and mutual trust and benefit between organizations and their stakeholders (improved relationships with suppliers, customers, community, etc.).
• Opportunity for organizations to achieve sustainable competitive advantage by integrating the principles of sustainability and the RS in its vision and strategy
• Guidance for development policy: effectiveness, efficiency, governance and accountability government departments
• Increased awareness of social responsibility and the establishment of a common understanding on this issue and promote good practice
• should benefit society to processes, products and services based on practices economically viable, environmentally sound and socially just
• A better understanding clear and shared view of what he has to do with RS (philosophy, principles, practices)
• A structured approach and resources to implement the RS programs for a variety of groups (governmental, NGOs, companies, etc.).
• One more practice and the incorporation of RS across the organization as a bargaining tool for unions and the Government
• The rule will encourage and facilitate cooperation between PyMOs, big business, labor, government and civil society
With RS
• good management, there is an opportunity for countries and their firms to establish competitive advantages in markets
• world Make it a benchmark for setting national standards for social responsibility with the purpose of certification of third

Based on article published in: http://iso26000.com.ar/2010/08/foro-iso -26000-peru-INDECOPI /

How To Clear Phlegm For A Baby

Social Responsibility and Human Rights

As an organization does not understand the relevance of Human Rights will never be socially responsible

Following my active participation in the development process of ISO 26000 since its inception, a basic materials described in the future more standard called my attention, maybe because of my vocation but a professional humanist engineer, is the subject of Human Rights. That's why I would like to present a very personal vision of human rights and its relationship with the organizations and social responsibility through each of the major "stakeholders" ..

Human Rights and Social Responsibility

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is undoubtedly the first international initiative in social responsibility proclaimed and adopted in the year 1948 by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III ) United Nations on 10 December 1948. This being subsequently supplemented by the conventions on civil and political rights and Economic, social and cultural rights both passed in 1966 as International Covenants on Human Rights.

However, the first direct connection was when the year 1999 on the initiative of Kofi Annan established the Global Compact with their values \u200b\u200bconcerning human rights and labor practices, an initiative which remains 11 years after a major initiative in terms of corporate sustainability. Today

matter humamos rights, on the fundamental principle of being indivisible and interdependent, tangentially crosses all disciplines and fundamental practices of social responsibility and has links with all stakeholders of an organization (With senior management or organizational government, with partners, with their internal staff and contractors and consumers, competition, customer, community and of course as a result of the above, with the company.

human rights organization

An organization no matter the size, type, geographic location that you want to start on the issue of social responsibility and must comply with local laws must above all understand that the materials must respect and recognize both the importance and universality of human rights not only within your organization but through its sphere of influence that can have impact. Once the government understands this organization and set a public commitment, the road is much easier.

The human rights organization and the worker

To evaluate the impact of an organization on its stakeholders'll start with the most important and sometimes overlooked in an organization, the worker.

Perhaps this is the issue that should be more obvious because it already made the fundamental rights of workers are considered as human rights. According to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work of 1998 (specifically, the eight fundamental ILO Conventions). These rights are: freedom of association and effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining, elimination of all forms of forced labor, abolition of child labor and elimination of dicriminicación regards employment and occupation much discussed topic these days and in particular respect sexual orientation of individuals.

In my opinion there are other human rights workers are linked to working practices, which are: working conditions in which it operates, social protection, the right to fair remuneration, social dialogue, health and safety at work, the right to breathe healthy environment el desarrollo humano y la formación en el puesto de trabajo y en materia de derechos humanos, igualdad de oportunidades para todos y un tema muy comentado recientemente, el derecho a la conciliación de la vida familiar y personal.

La organización y los derechos humanos del proveedor

Si bien es cierto que las actividades de los proveedores pueden tener un alto impacto en la responsabilidad social de la organización, no menos cierto es que una organización aunque no sea responsable directa de posibles abusos de los derechos humanos por parte de sus proveedores, o aplicación de practicas laborales injustas a sus trabajadores, pudiese llegar a ser cómplice de los mismos, por lo cual, la organización debería take all necessary measures to avoid such situations and should have considerable influence in these areas either through their purchasing decisions or through supervision to verify compliance with the Declaration of Human Rights, international conventions and national laws in the labor.

addition, the organization should respect the rights of providers through a fair and timely payment.

The organization and the human rights of consumers and customers expect

consumers and customers of an organization on human rights, first to be considered as such, read beings humans, who are entitled to be informed about what they buy and consume, that they attend and be respected and not see them as enemies or difficult customers when they complain and to respect the privacy that is further referred to in the Declaration Universal Human Rights in its Article 12. Additionally, there are the United Nations Guidelines for Consumer Protection which is the most important international document in the field of consumer protection
. The General Assembly adopted the Guidelines in 1985 by consensus. In 1999 expanded to include provisions on sustainable consumption.

The human rights organization

community that the community expects of the organization, there is a dialogue and a commitment to their needs, they do not contaminate or destroy the environment and habitat, to respect the traditions of our indigenous people, who understand the gaps and they can support, which respects the dignity of people in the community who are given employment opportunities and development and general respect their social, cultural and economic.

Finally and as a consequence of the above

The human rights organization and society

As a society we hope to respect civil and political rights, we do not degrade from any reason, environmental, economically or socially, we do not discriminate against or mistreat and above all that organizations, like us as responsible consumers, contribute to sustainable development respecting our planet for future generations.

Published in: http://www.rseprohumanablog.cl/?p=5334

Groin Pain Infection Yeast

The ISO 26000 FDIS DIS to normalize

The ISO 26000 DIS to FDIS. Major changes

Finally after 5 years of discussions and a long way (during which they received thousands of comments) is already in service on FDIS (First Draft International Standard) of the ISO 26000 to be considered and voted by national standards for approval as an international standard in December this year.

From the first meeting in Salvador de Bahia, Brazil which was a time when it was thought that never reach a consensus, to Copenhagen where he passed his way to the FDIS stage.

Given that many are curious to know how you resolved the key points (CKTs) discussed at CPH, then I will give a description of each of the critical points that were discussed, and how they were treated and was the response which was given in the FDIS.

Accessibility and length of the document / content too detailed and complex
CKT1/CKT2
The document still has the same length and complexity, however after a detailed study of it and despite its complexity could become a valuable tool for understanding and implementing social responsibility.
Developing a tool so that it could be applied in SMEs. In

keep the length I've been saying from the beginning on in the document include aspects that are addressed in other documents of universal application, a typical example of this is all related to human rights and other

many International standards provide guidelines
This CKT3
point was resolved in the document including the following sentence: "An international standard that provides guidance does not contain requirements, but may contain recommendations." Additionally, references in the box does support 1 to the directives of the ISO / IEC Part 2. Annex / certifiable standards to keep or remove CKT4

Standards certifiable character remain in the standard bibliographic reference. However it is clear that being certified with any of these rules does not have any links with any certification to ISO 26000, as a reference to this will be interpreted as a misuse of the standard.

technical barrier to trade
CKT 5
The document does not define anything additional to that provided in the DIS and therefore is considered sufficiently clear intention not to be used as a technical barrier to trade. Clarify

regard to international norms of behavior and its relationship with local laws applicable CKT6

On this point I did not find any point in the FDIS addition to what already existed in the DIS, except for the inclusion of Note 3 in the definition of international standards of behavior on the development of standards over time. This was one of the most discussed during the previous stages of the document with strong opposition from the industry.

Principle (focus) CKT-7
precautionary
The precautionary approach on the subject of the environment is one of the unresolved issues in their entirety, although the text was improved, at the plenary meeting of government representatives United States supported by the Canadian government expressed sustained opposition to the text of the precautionary principle. Aspects

common but differentiated responsibilities CK-8

This item according to the proposal of the IDTF integrated translation should be treated in a hint box 11 but was not included in the FDIS. Sexual Orientation CKT9



This theme also of the precautionary principle was one of the most difficult to agree in Copenhagen at the end was achieved, and in spite of opposition from some people and especially the Swedish delegation, an agreement with Muslim countries changing the term "sexual orientation" with "personal relationships "because homosexuality is punishable by imprisonment in these countries.

In this regard many theories were discussed in a group created to resolve this conflict, on the one hand there was a risk that these countries were opposed to the standard and another that did not. Prevailed at the end that we must be aware that there are different cultures and to make an International Standard on social responsibility has to understand that cultures are very different and need to adapt to local realities of each situation and each company.

CKT10 Animal Welfare

There was no change to the DIS in this regard

clearly differentiate the responsibilities of state government and its administrative functions CKT11

The issue of government and state, issue widely discussed in recent reviews CD and DIS was resolved by making clear in the definition as in Chapter 3 "Understanding the Social Responsibility" on the point of the state and the RS.

Special emphasis on the fact that while organizations can operate in a socially responsible way that is not a substitute for effective discharge of the duties and responsibilities of the state. It was also pointed out that the purpose of this Standard the term "organization" did not include the actions of their own governments as sovereign role in the development and enforcement of the law as well as others derived from nature such as the establishment of policies public interest or international obligations as a state. Sphere of influence


CKT12
The theme of the sphere of influence is clarified in the definition as in Chapter 5. Recognizing Social Responsibility.

A point very decisive was the state that an organization is responsible for the impacts of their decisions and activities over which it has formal control and sphere of influence includes relationships within and beyond the value chain of the organization, but clarifying that entire value chain of an organization lies within the sphere of influence of an organization.

interested parties, involvement, interest
CKT13
This issue was addressed in Chapter 3 "Recognizing the RS" in the role of stakeholders and interested parties and society in Chapter 5 Recognition of the RS and involvement with the parties concerned.

Clarifies that stakeholders having one or more interests that may be affected by decisions and activities of an organization and this relationship is not formal or recognized by the stakeholders of the organization. Due diligence

CKT14

This issue was addressed in the definition, as in chapters 6 to Human Rights. Due diligence can also alert an organization about the responsibility to influence the behavior of others, in cases where the others can be the cause of human rights violations in which the organization could be involved.

difference between philanthropy and social investment CKT15

addition to leaving very clear that philanthropy understood as matters of charity can be positive to society can not be used as a substitute for the integration of CSR within the organization.

Another very important is the fact that clear and contrary to the opinion of many that social investments that contribute to the development of the community may or may not be associated with the core operational activities of the same.

Next step, wait for FDIS vote which ends Sept. 12 date on which we will know the final results.

Posted in: Blog ISO